Government’s Move to Demonetize Rs 500 & Rs 1000 Notes

Opinion Article By Reshma Krishnan
Never has a government initiative or policy changed caused this much rift between people and even caused friendships to come to blows on both social media platforms as well as family dinners. Whether you agree with the Prime Minister and the RBI’s move to demonetize the Rs 500 and Rs 1000 notes, or not, you cannot argue with the massive impact, and upheaval it has caused. Stories of sacks of money being burnt across the country and snaking queues outside ATM’s are spreading like wildfire. So why has it been done?
Well there are two specific reasons. By demonetizing Rs 500 and Rs 1000 notes, the Prime Minister and the RBI have for all practical purposes, rendered all those notes useless. Now yes, you can exchange it at the banks, but that will require identification. The parallel economy exists so that transactions can be made without identification. If you render all that money worthless, the parallel economy has no fuel, because everyone needs to buy bread at the end of the day. Those who hoard cash don’t want to hoard it. They would like to have it clean but having not paid taxes on said income, they are unable to clean the money. So they clean it by spreading it around. For instance, they pay for flight tickets and jewelry. They pay their staff, drivers, maids and nannies who don’t question the cash’s origin. They donate to political parties and charities, which consequently distribute it to people. By doing so and effectively distributing the money, they operate without cause for concern. When you demonetize the notes with such immediacy, there is no route for the money to trickle down the system. You can declare it of course and pay heavy penalties if it has not been declared before. So you burn it.
The other reason the notes were demonetized was to tackle the vicious cycle of fake currency. All fake notes are also useless because banks will not accept it. But there has also been a backlash to what people call an extremely ‘bold’ move by the PM and RBI. While it will work, the immediacy of it means that poor people, and people without bank accounts, or in fact anyone who deals in cash economy, have been badly affected. Lack of information dissemination has led to people getting worried about their savings. Yes, you and I have also been affected. We don’t want to stand in queues even though we are quite happy to wait for three hours for a darshan at a temple or behind a bar to get a drink. So let’s be clear, the only people suffering here are the ones who live outside the system and don’t understand it, the women who keep their meager savings in cash to protect it from their families.
How can we help? We can quell their fears. We can open bank accounts for them. We can tell them that they have till 30th December to deposit the money, and stand in line for them and help them out, where ever they are. We can assure them that they can exchange this money with some identification at a post office. If they have no ID, then help them get an Aadhar card. This move is an extremely bold move and WILL cripple the parallel economy. Yes, there are been problems with execution and there is no doubt, the cash economy will be hurt, as will those who depend on it. Could it have been executed better? Of course, but you can only do what is in your capacity to do. So do what you can to help them. Pay their salaries directly into bank accounts; explain to them that their savings are still valuable. But also tell them to be careful of ruthless people who want to exploit them by bribing them to use their accounts. Tell them it’s not worth it. I liken this exercise to cutting a leg off when you have gangrene. Sometimes, there is no choice.


Reshma Krishnan has over eight years of experience in Treasury and Corporate Finance, primarily in M&A and Corporate Fundraising. She comes to us from Avendus Capital, where she focused on M&A and Private Equity transactions in the Infrastructure and Manufacturing space. Her domain expertise lies in origination and deal execution particularly in the areas of financial modeling and documentation.

 

Trump’s Surprise Victory And Its Effects On The Financial Markets

In the News, The United States of America just concluded the elections for the 45th president of the great superpower. With a clean sweep of both the House and the Senate, Donald Trump, the republican candidate has been elected as the President, much to the surprise of the whole world. While America was in the last leg of these elections, the financial markets world over had begun to feel ripples of change, but with his surprise win, a lot of the financial services companies were left rattled and in grave uncertainties. While the whole world was expecting an entirely different outcome, the way things progressed, it seemed like a recap of the whole Brexit situation, which left a lot of people from both finance and non-finance backgrounds equally shocked. While there was uproar in certain places, for instance the Time Warner Company, which saw a fall of 1.45% drop in its shares, which was incidentally threatened by Trump for concentrating the power in the hands of very few people.

The world news is strife with reports of a number of people losing a lot of money across borders. The Global bond investors have recorded a loss of about $337 billion, which is close to 22 lakh crores of rupees. The global value of the bonds’ market slid by $692 billion, which is over 46 lakh crores of rupees over the last three days. Presently there seems to be a lot of uproar and unrest, both in the country of America as well as on the global financial front. But there are a lot of people who believe that once things calm down a bit, there are very high chances of the financial companies, of accepting the stance of the President elect. Although the Trump campaign has been extremely devoid of any details on financial policy except for his claims and promises to freeze all new regulations, in terms of certain divisions between commercial banking and investment banking.

As Republicans have literally taken it all, in terms of both the Senate and the House, there are concrete chances of a lot of changes to the Dodd-Frank Act, which will the restructuring of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau and raising the bank regulation over its current $50 billion level of assets. There are also theories, which state that Trump can turn to a different approach, which has been put forth by the chairman of the House Financial Services Committee Chairman, Jeb Hensarling, which basically deal with a bill, which extensively talks about the various segments of the Dodd-Frank and suggests alternative measures. Trump and his criticisms for the Wall Street are likely to support the deregulation of the industry and might prove to be a greater challenge for bigger firms. Another potential financial blow to the financial institutions, could be Hillary’s loss in the strong democratic states, which in turn give more courage to the progressive wing of the party. One thing is certain, that the legislature would not be able to break the giants in the banking sector apart, but would definitely have a lot of negative headlines for the biggest banks in the country. The markets still face a tumultuous situation as everyone gears to wait for the time when Trump, officially begins his presidency.


This, and a lot more, is one of the topics we discuss in our The Foreign Exchange and International Trade Prodegree program in India. You can also watch the video what our experts says about this video.